Talk:Shipping (fandom)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Shipping (fandom) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2 |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Netflix and LGBT representation in animation was copied or moved into Shipping (fandom) with this edit on May 5, 2021. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
![]() | Reference ideas for Shipping (fandom) The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
I hate how the mods keep changing the shipping image to the Mickey X Oswald
[edit]Are you guys actually homo I mean there's nothing wrong with being gay but all of you love changing it to that images and making admin abuse excuses even when there's a even more better image that's not copyrighted.
STOP ADMIN ABUSING ShadowDaLoser (talk) 23:29, 27 November 2024 (UTC)
- Neither casual homophobia nor accusing people of "admin abusing" (in all-caps and bold!) is likely to persuade people to your point of view. The image you wanted to use in the article has been deleted for copyright reasons, so we clearly can't use that. What other image do you suggest would be better than the current one? Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
- You are exactly right. The view of the user you are replying to is definitely not going to persuade people to change their opinions.--Historyday01 (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2024 (UTC)
Shipping doesn't have to be romantic.
[edit]On the actual article, it states that "the desire by followers of a fandom for two or more people, either real-life people or fictional characters (in film, literature, television series, etc.), to be in a romantic relationship." However, shipping is derived from the word 'relationship,' which is not always romantic. Sure, fandom shipping is USUALLY romantic, but that doesn't change the fact that relationships include siblings, parent and child, and literally friends. Not called a friend-SHIP for no reason, is it?
Not editing the original article because I don't want to cause an issue.
Sorry for being petty. I'm just trying to prove a point to someone. Cassidyspite (talk) 01:28, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Ok. I would say it generally does mean romantic, so I don't see a reason to change it. Historyday01 (talk) 13:15, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Friendships are a type of relationship, but "shipping" specifically refers to romantic relationships. It was originally coined specifically about a romantic relationship, and the sources cited in this article specifically say that it refers to romantic relationships. Possibly some people use the word more broadly but that would be a definite minority position and without sources discussing such a use we should not put it in the article. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 13:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Right, exactly. Historyday01 (talk) 20:58, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
- Friendships are a type of relationship, but "shipping" specifically refers to romantic relationships. It was originally coined specifically about a romantic relationship, and the sources cited in this article specifically say that it refers to romantic relationships. Possibly some people use the word more broadly but that would be a definite minority position and without sources discussing such a use we should not put it in the article. Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 13:46, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
Real person shipping
[edit]Possibly this article should include something on real person shipping, and the problems with that. It doesn't seem to be mentioned outside the WP:LEAD. Gråbergs Gråa Sång (talk) 09:16, 1 February 2025 (UTC)
Could we change the main image?
[edit]We don't even have to remove the image from the article but I think we should pick an image that is better suited as the current one is the first thing you see when you hover over a link for this article. The image makes shipping in general to be way more lewd than it is and frankly kind of problematic as Mickey and Oswald are commonly considered brothers. DepressedChickenNugget (talk) 21:50, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Do you have an alternative suitably licensed image that you think would be better? Frankly I'm struggling to think of a less lewd image which would be appropriate – they aren't even kissing! Caeciliusinhorto (talk) 22:06, 26 March 2025 (UTC)
- Start-Class culture articles
- Mid-importance culture articles
- WikiProject Culture articles
- Start-Class fictional character articles
- WikiProject Fictional characters articles
- Start-Class Internet articles
- Mid-importance Internet articles
- WikiProject Internet articles
- Start-Class Internet culture articles
- Mid-importance Internet culture articles
- WikiProject Internet culture articles
- Start-Class Literature articles
- Mid-importance Literature articles
- Start-Class romance articles
- Mid-importance romance articles
- WikiProject Romance articles
- Start-Class LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- Articles created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride 2021
- Articles created or improved during Wiki Loves Pride 2022